tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post111449600570174402..comments2024-01-22T08:01:58.626-08:00Comments on Panexperientialism: Feeling feelings - Or not?Justinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06145123903223215665noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-31819818582742485682009-12-26T04:43:01.738-08:002009-12-26T04:43:01.738-08:00Nice story as for me. It would be great to read mo...Nice story as for me. It would be great to read more about that matter. Thank you for giving that info.<br />Sexy Lady<br /><a href="http://www.baccaratgirls.com/" rel="nofollow">Russian Escorts</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-1130503309558414002005-10-28T05:41:00.000-07:002005-10-28T05:41:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-1116062029594787062005-05-14T02:13:00.000-07:002005-05-14T02:13:00.000-07:00Yes, I think it's difficult, if not impossible, to...Yes, I think it's difficult, if not impossible, to arrive at a conception of how basic, nonervous experience might 'feel' by reasoning alone.<BR/>Outside the philosophical domain though, I am open to the possibility that meditative, mystical or other states may provide direct intuitions into the 'feelings of things'. <BR/><BR/>JustinAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-1115825006990213982005-05-11T08:23:00.000-07:002005-05-11T08:23:00.000-07:00I agree with your thrust here. The way I thought ...I agree with your thrust here. The way I thought about it is that the amplified experience generated by the brain/nervous system is just exceedingly more robust than the experiential aspect of other systems. Using human experience as a guide to infer what more primitive experience is like is therefore difficult.Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14851240963321295307noreply@blogger.com