tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post116203678310816940..comments2024-01-22T08:01:58.626-08:00Comments on Panexperientialism: Experience and the subjectJustinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06145123903223215665noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-33640278943565567442010-10-21T14:28:16.189-07:002010-10-21T14:28:16.189-07:00Ezperiencing: A modification of the word experien...Ezperiencing: A modification of the word experiencing to ammend its' meaning with the philosophic premise that it indicates the ground and substance of all our things, happenings and selves. -Bumbker (Ronald S. Reynolds)Anonymoushttp://bumbker.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-14019107285555914372010-10-12T12:27:04.855-07:002010-10-12T12:27:04.855-07:00EZPERIENCE: A modification of the word experience ...EZPERIENCE: A modification of the word experience to amend its' meaning with the philosophic premise that it indicates the ground and substance of all our things, happenings and selvesRonald S. Reynoldshttp://bumbker.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-1165999285551195792006-12-13T00:41:00.000-08:002006-12-13T00:41:00.000-08:00Thanks for the comments Gregg. I'm looking forward...Thanks for the comments Gregg. I'm looking forward to reading your book closely soon.<BR/>JustinJustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06145123903223215665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7449019.post-1162329311010873462006-10-31T13:15:00.000-08:002006-10-31T13:15:00.000-08:00I didn't read this Strawson paper, but the argumen...I didn't read this Strawson paper, but the argument sounds right in tune with Whitehead, as you say.<BR/><BR/>As for Kind's paper, it basically came down to a complaint that it is awfully hard to intuitively grasp how simple entities could be experiential. It wasn't a philosophical argument at all.Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14851240963321295307noreply@blogger.com